Are U.S.-Iran tensions moving toward a ceasefire — or escalating behind the rhetoric?

That question is now driving global markets, as President Donald Trump's claims of "great progress" in talks with Iran collide with a reality on the ground that shows no clear signs of de-escalation.

For now, Wall Street is giving Trump the benefit of the doubt, but for how long remains to be seen.

The Contradiction At The Center Of Everything

For the past 48 hours, the dominant market narrative has been built on a series of claims by Trump. The U.S. and Iran, he said Monday, engaged in "very good and productive conversations" aimed at a "complete and total resolution" of the conflict.

Strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure would be paused for five days to allow talks to proceed, Trump continued.

By Tuesday, the messaging turned more definitive. "This war has been won," Trump declared, adding, "I think we're going to end it."

According to the New York Times, Washington sent Tehran a 15-point proposal via intermediaries. Regional officials were said to be discussing high-level talks within days.

The Financial Times later confirmed that Iran was allowing non-hostile vessels to transit the Strait of Hormuz under its own trade terms.

Diplomacy appeared to be underway, and markets reacted by pricing in the de-escalation. Oil prices sharply dropped with WTI below $90 and Brent below $100. Risk assets moved higher.

The ceasefire trade was in motion. However, on Wednesday, Iran's Fars News Agency said Tehran would not accept a ceasefire and would not enter negotiations with a party it accused of violating prior agreements.

The Foreign Ministry went further. There are no talks. There have been no talks since Feb. 28. No negotiations exist.

Trump's 15-Point Plan vs. Iran's 5 Conditions: A Deal That Doesn't Exist

The two sides are negotiating from fundamentally incompatible starting points.

While Washington's reported 15-point plan centers on constraining Iran's nuclear program, limiting its missile capabilities, and restoring open access to the Strait of Hormuz, Tehran's counter-position moves in the opposite direction.

The nuclear demands are understood to be the core sticking point.

The United States is seeking a framework under which Iran would have no nuclear enrichment capability — a demand Trump himself articulated Tuesday when he said “they’re not going to have enrichment.”

This goes significantly beyond the terms of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, which allowed Iran limited enrichment.

For Tehran, this demand is not a negotiating position to be haggled over.

According to a Iran’s Press TV, any ceasefire is conditional on five non-negotiable demands:

  1. A complete halt to attacks and assassinations
  2. Binding guarantees against future aggression
  3. Full war reparations
  4. A coordinated end to hostilities across all regional fronts
  5. An international recognition of Iran's sovereign control over Hormuz.

These are not concessions — they are preconditions. Crucially, Iran has made clear that no negotiations will even begin unless all five are accepted in full.

That leaves the two frameworks not just far apart, but structurally misaligned: one seeks to reduce Iran's strategic capabilities, the other seeks to formalize and protect them.

What Is Actually Happening On The Ground

Against Washington's optimistic tone, the data from the conflict zone tells a different story.

According to Goldman Sachs commodities team, Hormuz oil flows remain at about 5% of normal levels, implying a collapse of roughly 95% from pre-war conditions.

The disruption to Persian Gulf exports is estimated at 15.5 million barrels per day, while floating storage has surged by more than 80 million barrels since late February.

Refinery outages remain elevated, and fuel markets are under strain globally. U.S. diesel prices have risen sharply since the start of the conflict.

These are not conditions associated with a conflict moving toward resolution.

They are consistent with a system under sustained stress.

Military developments reinforce that view. Iran and Israel have continued exchanging strikes into midweek. Attacks have hit regional infrastructure, including Kuwaiti airport facilities.

The U.S. is preparing additional troop deployments, while Gulf states are edging closer to direct involvement.

According to CNN, around 1,000 US soldiers from the Army's 82nd Airborne Division are expected to deploy to the Middle East in the coming days.

There is no observable slowdown in hostilities.

No pause in strikes.

No operational evidence of de-escalation.

Prediction Markets Tell Near-Term Ceasefire Is Not The Base Case

Prediction markets offer a clear signal: a ceasefire is not a consensus view in the near term.

Polymarket odds of a U.S.-Iran ceasefire by March 31 sit at about 15%, rising to 25% by April 7 and 37% by April 15.

Even by the end of April, the probabilities of a ceasefire are still below the 50% threshold. Meanwhile, betting-implied chances on the Strait of Hormuz returning to normal by the end of April are as low as 33%.

That is not the profile of an imminent diplomatic breakthrough.

It's not until late May and June that markets begin to price in a resolution as likely as not.

It suggests that traders are actively fading a quick diplomatic resolution, even as headlines point in that direction.

In other words, prediction markets are not buying the timeline.

Wall Street Gives Trump Benefit Of The Doubt — For Now

Risk sentiment on Wall Street is diverging from both the reality on the ground and the signals from prediction markets.

Wednesday morning, markets woke up to peace.

Equities are broadly higher, oil has pulled back, and Brent has slipped below $100 per barrel. Cyclical sectors are leading the move, reflecting a market leaning decisively toward de-escalation in the Middle East.

As of 10:30 a.m. ET, the Russell 2000 is leading with a 1.6% gain, signaling renewed appetite for domestic, growth-sensitive stocks. The Nasdaq 100 — as tracked by the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ:QQQ) — is up 1.3%, while the S&P 500 is gaining 1.0% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average is adding 0.9%.

Sector performance reinforces that positioning.

The Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSE:XLY) is the top performer, up 1.7%, while the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSE:XLE) is lagging, down 0.3% — a clear unwind of geopolitical risk premium.

Within discretionary, war-battered cruise stocks are leading the rebound. Carnival Corp (NYSE:CCL), Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd (NYSE:NCLH) and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (NYSE:RCL) are each up more than 3%.

This is not defensive positioning. It is a market pricing normalization.

But that pricing stands in contrast with both the data and the diplomatic reality. There is no confirmed negotiation channel, no agreed timeline, and no indication from Tehran that talks even exist.

The result is a widening gap between what Wall Street is pricing and what the underlying conditions suggest.

Image: Shutterstock