The operator of a digital hub for automotive components and services is seeking a Hong Kong listing, citing plans to expand its coverage to meet rising demand   

image credit: Bamboo Works

Key Takeaways: 

  • Casstime increased its revenue and gross profit last year, but logged a wider net loss, hit by operating costs and fair-value changes 
  • Its shareholders include Shanghai Capital and Germany's Bosch

With signs of a pick-up in some automotive stocks, a car parts and servicing platform has joined the convoy of companies heading to the equity market.

Casstime Holdings Ltd., which focuses on China's automotive aftermarket, has applied to list on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with China International Capital Corp (CICC) as the sole sponsor.

The proposed capital-raising follows a surge in overall IPO interest and reflects a brightening mood in parts of the auto sector, led by shares in Geely Automobile (0175.HK) and BYD (OTC:BYDDY) (OTC:BYDDF) (1211.HK) as rising fuel prices look to boost sales of electric vehicles. 

Casstime operates platforms to facilitate the maintenance and repair of vehicles after they are sold, by matching businesses such as workshops and parts suppliers. It foresees rising demand from the boom in electric vehicles, whose batteries or other systems need to be periodically replaced or upgraded.

Founded in 2015, Casstime launched desktop versions of its auto parts trading platform and services system the following year and has since folded in a suite of artificial intelligence features for smart matching. Current backers include Shunwei Capital, which counts Xiaomi founder Lei Jun as one of its stakeholders, as well as Fosun International and Germany's Bosch.

The aftermarket encompasses products and services to maintain, repair or modify a vehicle over its lifetime. From 2021 to 2025, the mainland Chinese aftermarket grew at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.8%, outpacing the global average of 2.1%, according to industry research cited in the IPO application. As new energy vehicles (NEVs) gain stronger traction, the study projects the market will reach 2.2 trillion yuan ($320 billion) by 2030.

Compared to fuel-powered vehicles, NEVs have shorter product lifecycles and a faster pace of updates. As a result, distributors need to stock a wider and more complex set of components, each with a distinct code for inventory tracking.

The NEVs with their three main electrical parts – the battery, the motor and the control system – combine attributes of a traditional combustion engine with the iterative characteristics of electronic products. These factors, coupled with battery degradation and progress in vehicle intelligence, drive growth in the volume of parts that must be stored and processed.

The company said it would spend the IPO proceeds on expanding its parts stores and coverage to build what it called a comprehensive matrix, as well as investing in digital infrastructure and logistics. 

According to figures in the application, China's top five automotive aftermarket enterprises achieved a combined gross merchandise volume (GMV) of 16.5 billion yuan last year. Casstime topped the list with a19% market share on a GMV of 7.6 billion yuan, far ahead of the second-ranked player's 5.8% share. At the end of 2025, its platform boasted 37,500 registered automotive workshops and listed 48 million accessories or parts, with average monthly traffic of around 3.6 million visits, while the number of intended and completed orders reached 22.5 million and 11.3 million over the year.

Costs erode the bottom line

The company's revenue comes from three main segments: the factory-to-business brand CassChoice, the business-to-business CassMall and value-added services.

CassChoice sources automotive parts directly from manufacturers and sells them to distributors. CassMall operates as a one-stop trading platform for auto parts, matching workshops with suppliers in real time and collecting a commission on transactions. The third strand is made up of subscription fees for its workshop management system as well as commissions from logistics services.

Last year, the sourcing platform CassChoice was the largest revenue earner, but the parts trading site CassMall, with much higher margins, provided a bigger chunk of profits.

CassChoice accounted for 70.8% of 2025 income, followed by CassMall at 23.1% and value-added services at 6.1%. When it came to gross profit, CassMall jumped to the top of the rankings at 200 million yuan, with services adding 45.3 million yuan and CassChoice lagging with 20.25 million yuan.

Spending outpaces gross profit

Overall, revenue rose 25.3% last year to 930 million yuan and gross profit increased 19.4% to 260 million yuan. However, overall gross margin slipped 1.4 percentage points to 28.3% from the prior year and the company logged a net loss of nearly 400 million yuan. Combined expenses for sales and marketing, administration and R&D reached 310 million yuan, already exceeding gross profit. The firm took a further 340 million yuan hit from fair-value changes related to convertible bonds.

Casstime boasts a roster of prominent shareholders, but it is still far from breaking even. Meanwhile, Anthropic's launch of agentic AI tools in February has sent shockwaves through the market, hurting software and platform stocks worldwide.

Software stocks listed in Hong Kong and China provide a useful comparison in judging a realistic pricing strategy for Casstime. Marketing services provider Weimob (2013.HK) trades at price-to-sales ratio of 3.4 times, while cloud computing firm Kingdee International (0268.HK) trades at 3.8 times and Kingsoft (3888.SH) has a multiple of 2.9. A ratio of around 3 times looks to be appropriate for Casstime in the absence of profits. If the IPO is pitched above that, the price would probably slip after the debut. Given that expenses outpace operational profits, investors may want the company to focus on cutting costs once it is listed.

To subscribe to Bamboo Works free weekly newsletter, click here

Benzinga Disclaimer: This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.