NatWest Group (NYSE:NWG) released second-quarter financial results and hosted an earnings call on Friday. Read the complete transcript below.

Benzinga APIs provide real-time access to earnings call transcripts and financial data. Visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ to learn more.

Access the full call at https://natwest-events.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_BAWdPfkJQQuud4ecVQkh8g#/registration

Summary

NatWest Group reported strong financial performance with a return on tangible equity of 19.7%, and customer assets and liabilities grew by 13.4%, boosted by the acquisition of Evelyn Partners.

The company aims to grow customer assets and liabilities by more than 4% annually and reduce the cost-income ratio to below 45% by 2028. Operating leverage improved, with income growth outpacing cost growth.

NatWest Group upgraded its 2026 guidance, expecting a return on tangible equity of more than 19%, and plans to announce a share buyback by year-end.

The acquisition of Evelyn Partners enhances the company's wealth management capabilities. The integration is progressing well, with a focus on revenue opportunities.

The company is leveraging AI to improve customer experience and operational efficiency, and has shown significant growth in the retail bank, private banking, and commercial sectors.

Management highlighted a strong capital generation and a robust balance sheet with a CET1 ratio of 13.2% after the Evelyn Partners acquisition.

Future strategies include capitalizing on opportunities in infrastructure, social housing, and transition finance, aiming for compounding growth and sustainable returns.

Full Transcript

OPERATOR

Good morning and welcome to NatWest Group's H1 2026 results management presentation. Today's presentation will be hosted by CEO Paul Thwaite and CFO Katie Murray. After the presentation, we will take questions.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us. Our results today show how we have created a bank with increasing momentum through our focus on sustainable growth and returns. By delivering growth across all three businesses, improving operating leverage and managing our capital and risk, we have created the most efficient large UK bank with the lowest cost of risk, delivering the strongest capital generation and highest returns. Our ambition for the future is founded on the strengths we've created and the opportunities we see ahead.

The UK's next phase of growth will be shaped by a handful of defining trends, so we have built leadership positions in areas that will drive the next decade such as wealth, AI and infrastructure. Our performance makes clear we have the capability and capacity to grow at scale. So we're seizing the opportunity to maximize our position as a trusted partner for customers and to help stimulate growth across the UK. In February, we set out how we plan to deliver our 2028 targets by pursuing disciplined growth, leveraging simplification and actively managing our capital and risk.

Our aim is to grow customer assets and liabilities at an annual rate of more than 4%, to reduce our cost income ratio to below 45% and to generate over 200 basis points of capital before distributions with a return on tangible equity of more than 18%. Our strategy is delivering excellent results as we make good progress against these ambitions. So let me give you the financial headlines. We have deliberately built a scaled business that benefits from structural UK growth drivers to deliver strong returns on a sustainable basis.

Our return on tangible equity was industry leading at 19.7%. Our acquisition of Evelyn Partners has now completed and boosts our exposure to the fast growing UK wealth market. Customer assets and liabilities grew 13.4% including Evelyn Partners and assets under management and administration increased more than 150% to $131 billion. Excluding Evelyn Partners, CAL grew 5.2%, well above our target of more than 4%. We continue to drive operating leverage.

Income growth of 8.9% is significantly ahead of cost growth of 4.5% and our cost income ratio reduced 2.8 percentage points to 46%, getting close to our 2028 target. Strong operating leverage together with a low cost of risk has driven 23% growth in earnings per share to 38 pence, with a 26% increase in our interim dividend to 12p and a 13% uplift in TNAV per share excluding Evelyn Partners. We also generated high levels of capital at 137 basis points and our balance sheet remains strong with a CET1 ratio of 13.2% after the acquisition of Evelyn Partners.

Given the strength of our performance and our confidence in the outlook, we are upgrading our 2026 returns guidance to more than 19%. Our strong capital generation has allowed us to invest in growth and acquire Evelyn Partners while still having surplus capital. So we are bringing forward the point at which we consider buybacks by six months to the year end results. You can see from the distribution of CAL on this slide that with the addition of Evelyn Partners we now have three scale businesses.

Growth is broad based and diversified across them. Each one shows increasing operating leverage and each one delivers industry leading returns of 20% or more. All three businesses are well positioned to benefit from attractive structural growth opportunities and we are allocating capital dynamically to optimise risk adjusted returns. Our retail bank has a strong track record of gaining share at attractive returns with a clear opportunity for further growth in key target areas.

We now have the UK's leading private banking and wealth management business in a high growth market where regulatory change is accelerating customer demand and Commercial and Institutional is capturing structural growth opportunities by building on its leading position in mid market banking and in sectors such as infrastructure and social housing. So let me update you on our strategic progress. Our retail bank serves 19 million customers, or one in three UK families.

We have an opportunity to continue growing in savings, investments and lending to align with our share of current accounts of over 16%. One way we are capturing this is by targeting growth in key customer segments such as youth, families and affluent. By strengthening our leading position in the youth market, we are creating the next generation of primary banking relationships and boosting our long term funding base. We are building here on the success of our NatWest Rooster Money app.

Its customer base has grown 18 times since 2021 and it has a leading net promoter score of 72. We increased the number of Rooster customers by 15% over the last year. We opened around 50% more junior ISAs and we enhanced our offer for teenagers with a new card and new features on the app. We also grew our share in savings and investments, mainly with affluent customers, as we opened 20 more ISA accounts and attracted 32% more customers to invest with us.

There was also strong momentum in our private banking and wealth management business prior to the acquisition of Evelyn Partners. It attracted 2 billion of net inflows to assets under management. This is a record performance representing a 33% uplift on last year and more than 9% of opening balances. These inflows were supported by over 45,000 customers across the group investing with us for the first time, a 60% uplift on last year, as well as 11% growth in the number of high net worth clients we serve with more than 3 million of assets and liabilities.

This progress will be accelerated by the acquisition of Evelyn Partners which I'll talk about on the next slide. Commercial and Institutional is the UK's biggest bank for business. It serves one and a half million customers across the UK, ranging from startups, where we have a leading 20% share, through the mid market to large corporates and financial institutions. We gain a clear competitive advantage here from our long standing presence across the nations and regions as well as our highly experienced network of more than 1,000 relationship managers.

They are rooted in their local communities, offering businesses both local knowledge and deep sector expertise. This enables us to play an important role in regional economies, giving us a distinctive platform to support investment and capture growth. We are capitalizing on our market leading positions in areas such as infrastructure, social housing and transition finance to take advantage of structural growth and building on our leading position in debt capital markets to support corporates not just with lending but with broader funding needs.

We delivered 23 billion of climate and transition finance in the first half, making good progress towards our 200 billion 2030 target. All three businesses continue to leverage simplification to improve customer and colleague experience and drive efficiency. The use of AI is changing how our customers live and work as well as their expectations of us. It is also reshaping financial services. While the pace is faster and the tools have evolved, the fundamentals remain the same.

Success in our sector has long been built on relationships and on trust. So the real value of AI comes when it builds stronger customer relationships, strengthens trust and delivers growth through better insight, experience and outcomes. That's why we continue to invest in leading capabilities. Last year we created a new AI Research office to enable faster innovation and to accelerate our responsible deployment of AI. The benefits for both customers and colleagues are a smoother customer experience, quicker, more informed decisions and more time for colleagues to focus on what matters most, building trusted relationships and delivering better customer outcomes. So for example, we are using AI to deliver new customer propositions faster, in hours rather than weeks; to help customers understand their spending habits better; to help them resolve cases of fraud through natural language conversations with our digital assistant Cora; and to provide relationship managers with greater client insight and more capacity for productive engagement. The operational momentum in each of our businesses is demonstrated by operating profit growth of more than 15%.

I'd like to turn now to the acquisition of Evelyn Partners. Evelyn Partners allows us to deliver an exciting step change in our private banking and wealth management business, generating sustainable growth and returns. We now have a highly differentiated, scalable, end to end wealth proposition comprising advice, planning and investments, with the largest employed network of financial advisors across the UK and a highly regarded direct to consumer investment platform.

The combination of planning and investment capabilities with banking, savings and wealth management services gives us a unique position in the market and a distinctive offering for our 20 million customers. One month in, Evelyn Partners is performing in line with expectations and the integration is going well. We were able to hit the ground running having planned since February and we're executing at pace with a focus on the most valuable revenue opportunities.

We have a single leadership team under Emma Crystal. We have created an integrated financial planning team to take advantage of opportunities like targeted support and we're already seeing business referrals in both directions. So we are excited about the opportunity ahead and the value that Evelyn Partners brings both for the group and for shareholders. We look forward to updating you further at an in depth spotlight in the fourth quarter. Our strategy is focused on driving sustainable growth and returns, which in turn generates higher levels of capital, giving us both resilience and flexibility.

So let me remind you of our approach to capital allocation. We have a robust balance sheet and aim to operate with a CET1 ratio of around 13%, giving us appropriate headroom above minimum requirements. Our strong capital generation enables us to invest in our business, to grow and to deepen customer relationships. We are both disciplined and dynamic in our deployment of capital and our diversification across three businesses gives us optionality through the cycle to optimise risk adjusted returns.

We also apply a high bar as we consider acquisitions that accelerate our progress through additional scale or capabilities. Our strategy is delivering attractive and growing shareholder returns and we remain committed to a dividend growth payout ratio of around 50% and to return surplus capital to shareholders via share buybacks. This translates into the compounding growth in earnings, dividends and TNAV per share. Given the strength of our performance and the inclusion of Evelyn Partners, we are upgrading our 2026 guidance.

We now expect a return on tangible equity of more than 19% and we are bringing forward the date when we consider share buybacks to our full year 20 results. The momentum we're seeing in customer growth, efficiency and returns gives us great confidence for the future. By driving disciplined growth, increasing our operating leverage and managing our balance sheets and risk, we have created a business capable of delivering strong, compounding, sustainable returns through the cycle.

With that, I'll hand over to Katie to take you through the results.

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Paul. I'll cover this second quarter using the first quarter as a comparator. Our strong performance in the first quarter continued in the second with broad-based growth, income momentum and improved operating leverage. Income excluding notable items increased 5.4% to £4.4 billion and total operating costs grew 1.8% to £2.1 billion, driving a 1 percentage point improvement in the cost-income ratio to 45.5%. The impairment charge was £140 million, equivalent to 30 basis points of loans.

This resulted in 12.4% growth in operating profit to £2.3 billion. Profit attributable to ordinary share on tangible equity of 21%. Turning now to income, income excluding notable items was up 5.4% at £4.4 billion. Income across our three businesses continued to grow supported by an increase in CAL margin expansion and higher non-interest income. Net interest margin was 249 basis points, up 2 basis points, with deposit margin expansion partly offset by the mix of lending.

Non-interest income grew 15% or £124 million, supported by strong customer activity in Commercial & Institutional together with higher insurance fee income following our decision to partner with a new insurance provider. Looking forward to the second half, we expect an income contribution of around £275 million from Evelyn Partners. Given the strength of our performance and the inclusion of Evelyn Partners, we now expect full-year income excluding notable items of around £17.9 billion.

Turning now to customer assets and liabilities, or CAL, we are pleased with our continued track record of growth and the addition of Evelyn Partners. CAL increased by £86.8 billion in the quarter, or 9.6%, to £986.9 billion. This comprises £9.6 billion of broad-based customer lending growth, £2.8 billion of customer deposit growth and a £73.9 billion increase in assets under management and administration, including Evelyn Partners. I'll touch on each of these elements in turn.

We're reporting another quarter of strong broad-based loan growth across the group, with gross loans to customers up £9.7 billion. Retail Banking and Private Banking & Wealth Management balances grew £4 billion, or 1.7%. This comprises £3.9 billion in mortgages and £0.1 billion in unsecured lending. Our mortgage stock share increased slightly in the quarter to 12.7% with record applications in March. Commercial & Institutional continues to be the fastest growing segment, with lending up £5.7 billion, or 3.6%.

Within this, growth is the strongest for larger corporates and institutions, where we see continued strong demand driven by structural trends including digitisation and decarbonisation. Our mid-market customers are showing healthy demand driven by manufacturing and social housing, and our smaller Business Banking customer balances are stable, with potential for growth once government schemes are fully repaid. Turning now to deposits. Customer deposits grew by £2.8 billion in the quarter.

This was driven by Commercial & Institutional, where deposits increased by £2.5 billion with broad-based growth across Business Banking, Commercial, Markets and our large corporates. Private Banking & Wealth Management deposits were about £0.3 billion, mainly as a result of growth in savings balances. Retail Banking deposits were stable with further migration to fixed and variable rate deposits as customers prioritised tax-efficient savings options.

Overall deposit mix continues to be stable. Turning now to assets under management. Assets under management and administration closed the quarter at £130.6 billion. This includes the addition of £71.7 billion from Evelyn Partners and a £4 billion reduction in assets under administration following the sale of Cushon in May. Excluding both Evelyn and Cushon, AUM were £6.2 billion higher in the quarter, comprising positive market performance of £5.1 billion and net inflows of £1.4 billion.

Net inflows to assets under management of £1.1 billion were a record high at 10.2% of opening AUM on an annualised basis, demonstrating accelerating client confidence and strong momentum. Turning now to costs, we are pleased that once again we have driven operating leverage as income growth has outpaced cost growth. Other operating expenses were £2 billion in the second quarter, taking the total to £4.1 billion for the first half. Our persistent focus on simplification delivered a further £250 million of gross cost savings in the first half, which gives us the capacity to continue investing in the business.

And we front-loaded investment spend in the first half to speed up our transformation. We also increased pay for staff by 4.1%, which took effect in April. The impact of this has been largely offset by a reduction in the number of employees. Our cost-to-income ratio reduced by 2.8 percentage points to 46% and we now expect other operating expenses of around £8.5 billion for the full year, including around £300 million for Evelyn Partners. We have given you a more detailed breakdown on this slide.

Turning now to impairments, credit performance remains strong and we benefit from a structurally low loan impairment rate and strong asset quality. The impairment charge for the quarter was £140 million, equivalent to 30 basis points of loans. We saw no new signs of stress across our three businesses and we continue to expect a loan impairment rate below 25 basis points for 2026. The change in our economic scenarios and weights this quarter was immaterial for expected credit loss.

We carry economic uncertainty post-model adjustments of £284 million with total PMAs of £360 million. Turning now to capital. Paul explained our capital allocation policy earlier and our capital bridge here is aligned with that. As you know, our business is highly capital generative. We ended the first half with a Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of 14% with four distributions in line with the year end. 142 basis points was invested in our acquisition of Evelyn Partners.

Our earnings power is reflected in 197 basis points of CET1 capital generation, which was boosted by 31 basis points of capital generation from RWA management. Our ongoing investment spend consumed 19 basis points and organic lending growth consumed 61 basis points. This means that, in effect, all our investment in growth was funded with just six months of capital generation and we were reporting a CET1 ratio of 13.2%. After accruing 50% of attributable profit for ordinary dividend payments, we expect to continue generating strong capital from earnings and RWA management.

And for 2026 we now anticipate capital generation before distributions and the impact of Evelyn Partners of more than 240 basis points. This is also before the impact of Basel 3.1 on 1 January 2027, where we continue to assume around £10 billion of RWA uplift. Turning now to guidance. Given our strong first half performance and the inclusion of Evelyn Partners, we are strengthening our 2026 guidance. We now expect income excluding notable items of around £17.9 billion, other operating expenses of around £8.5 billion, greater than 240 basis points and a return on tangible equity of more than 19%.

Finally, we now expect to announce our next buyback with our full-year results in February. And with that, I'll hand back to the operator for Q&A. Thank you.

OPERATOR

We will now take your questions. If you'd like to ask a question today, you may do so by using the raised hand function on the Zoom app. If you're dialing in by phone, you can press star nine to raise your hand and star six to unmute. Once prompted, we ask that questions are limited to two per person to allow an opportunity for more people to ask questions. We will take our first question from Shilsh of J.P. Morgan. Please unmute. Hi Shield.

Sheila, Analyst at J.P. Morgan

Hi guys. Hopefully you can hear me.

OPERATOR

Yeah, we got you.

Sheila, Analyst at J.P. Morgan

Good morning. I've got two, please. First, we've seen some changes to the leverage ratio come through and your leverage ratio requirement has fallen, as have some peers as well. And you clearly have improved the mortgage stock market share and this is a market that continues to grow. So I'd like to hear your thoughts on the changes to the leverage ratio and its application to the mortgage market. We had a peer yesterday talk about long-term asset margins declining in the mortgage market.

So I'd be keen to get your thoughts there. And then secondly, can I ask with regards to the Private Banking Wealth inflows of £2 billion that you saw in the first half, you made a point that 45,000 customers across the group have contributed to these inflows. I'm wondering when it comes to customer segmentation of your overall retail and corporate base, what is the target market we should be thinking of that are maybe applicable for wealth products within the existing customer base?

You know, how are you doing in terms of penetration? Off.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

That's great. Okay, Katie, why don't you talk a little bit about the leverage, maybe they want to talk about the mortgage market and I'll cover wealth.

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Super. Yeah, thanks very much. Thanks. Good morning, Shield. Look, the leverage framework announcements are very much as we had expected. We would expect to see a kind of 42 basis point reduction in our leverage requirements. However, I think Sheila, it's really important to note that we are not leverage constrained, so it doesn't release day one balance sheet capacity, but instead ensures that leverage does remain a backstop measure for us, all kind of very much in line with expectations.

Paul, do you want to.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Yeah, fine. I guess. Then the link to mortgages and look At the half one for ourselves on mortgages. As you say, we've grown slightly our mortgage market share, which is great, but our approach really has been very thoughtful in terms of trying to ensure that we're driving quality, decent growth. So we've been very mindful around kind of acceptable, making sure that we're right in deploying capital and mortgage market acceptable returns but also driving low cost of risk. So we've played the market really to take growth at the right times and, as you alluded to, at specific points it was a very competitive market.

So we've grown our balances by 4 billion and, yes, we've increased share but if you look at the areas we've focused on, you know, we've been buy-to-let. We've also signed a number of partnerships with digital platforms where we're, I guess, putting ourselves earlier in the customer journey to secure volume. Rightmove Chachi PT would be two examples of that. So we're being very thoughtful there. And the strategy on mortgages is to grow but to absolutely ensure that we're growing at the right return.

I think it's a little bit too early to draw any wider conclusions about the long-term prognosis for mortgage asset margins. I think the reality of some of the building societies is you may see, on what I call vanilla mortgages, more competitive pricing. But I think it's very early to draw conclusions. On the second question, different topic on private banking wealth management, yet very, very pleasing kind of organic AUM flows in a private bank: 2 billion net new money.

It's a record, 30% up on the same time last year. So that's great; part of that from the broader distribution, that's a proportion of it. So we've tripled the number of target—tripled the number of customers who are investing with us. We're making good progress on that. I'd also remember that it's not just the retail base, it's the commercial institutional base is a great source of referrals in terms of our customer segmentation and the opportunity and how we're going to execute across that opportunity.

The spotlight I announced in the presentation will be a great opportunity to dig into that further and we're going to talk about the different customer segments, how the proposition plays and how excited we are about the opportunities, but delighted with two things just to close off: the underlying momentum in the kind of the wealth management business, the organic momentum capabilities which opens up much wider opportunities. Thanks, Gill.

OPERATOR

Our next question comes from Alvaro Serenaro of Morgan Stanley. Alvaro, please open your and go ahead.

Alvaro Serenaro, Analyst at Morgan Stanley

Yes, I'm sort of struggling to unmute. Good morning. Kind of two questions on a similar theme around NII. Sort of your growth in lending in CIB and Corporate Institutional continues to be very strong, if anything accelerating. So can you sort of again talk us through what you're seeing latest in demand because it's accelerating more than sort of normalizing and, looking at your pipeline conversations, should we continue to expect an acceleration — this kind of level of pace for the foreseeable future — is it sustainable in your view?

Just a bit of color on that as we think about the next few quarters and next year, without explicit guidance I presume, but some color. And then on the deposits sort of competition again — your competitor — yes, they were making pretty sort of cautious comments and assumptions around limited deposit growth in the system with strong loan growth. That doesn't bode well for competition. Obviously in this quarter we saw the ISA season, but again any color on how you're thinking about, your best guess of how deposit competition may evolve in the next few quarters given the number of pictures.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Thanks, Alvaro. I've probably saved both of them, so on — yes, thanks for acknowledging the strong lending in C&I, continue to be pleased with that. As you alluded to, it's not just one quarter, it's a strong track record of growth and I think really it talks to both the scale of the franchise but also the quality of the franchise. So we have, in our view, distinct competitive advantages that are positioning against some of the key structural trends that we've had for almost at least a decade, I would say: infrastructure, social housing, etc., positioned as well.

So, yeah, for the half year I've touched on the areas that's coming through. You'll see in the disclosures infrastructure, social housing, housing, aspects of tech funds lending. There was also growth though in the mid market and in business banking as well. So it's not exclusively the large end. Looking at the pipeline, there's a lot of demand, so there is a strong pipeline of borrow — so to that direct question. So we feel that demand is resilient.

Plus, if you look at the system-level data, which I know you do, the Bank of England data, the growth — the PNFC growth — is around 8 or 9% from memory, so there's resilient demand. So we're not, you know, the good news is we're not needing to change any sort of risk appetite. We're growing, we're able to grow with the same risk appetite. That is a great support, so very encouraged there. And we think the strength of our franchise positions us very, very well.

On the other side of the balance sheet — deposits — some growth for the quarter, just under 3 billion. You can see that's come through the private bank and also through the commercial franchise. Retail, give or take, is flat, although there are some ups and downs. Current account balances up, for example. I think we should think quite broadly about this. We don't just see it as funding, we see it as a key part of the customer relationship and how we grow with customers.

So aspects of retail are competitive. Where we've chosen to focus — and you'll have seen this during the first six months — is where we see real relationship value. We haven't chased hot money. So, for example, the ISTC is an — we've competed, we've taken share, but that's because we see great relationship value. That's how we think about it. Looking out, we take quite a holistic approach. We work very closely — the treasury teams and the strategy team do a great job — to make sure that we're optimizing in terms of both the customer proposition but also the cost of funding.

And I think strategically what we've done over the last couple of years is really trying to ensure that we're owning the customer relationship early. So whether that's startups, whether that's innovation economy, whether it's youth through Rooster, and that means we build the primary relationship earlier and that comes with the high-value deposit. So strategically that's how I was thinking about it. So I think there will be — net, net, I'd say in the retail hot money space we're going to remain disciplined and we want to be thoughtful about where we, you know, where we invest and that needs to be where we can see wider customer values.

Thanks, Alvaro.

OPERATOR

Our next question comes from Benjamin Roberts of Goldman Sachs. Benjamin, please unmute and go ahead.

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Hey Ben, good morning.

Benjamin Roberts, Analyst at Goldman Sachs

Thank you very much for the presentation and taking the questions. Two from me please. First, a lot of focus today on capital generation and it's of course positive to see the share buyback expectations being pulled forward six months. If you look further ahead, how are you thinking about uses of capital generated as we move into 2027 and 2028, particularly in of how much RWA growth is consistent with that strong lending activity you're seeing and then how much capital that leaves to be returned to shareholders.

And then secondly, just on income of course strong as well this quarter. Could you talk through your expectations into the second half and if you're seeing much of a different backdrop on income between the different segments of the business and the balance of tailwinds versus headwinds in NII and non-NII. Thank you.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Thanks, Ben. Katie, when I take capital, you take income. Is that okay? So, on capital, Ben, yes — very strong capital generation in the first half, 137 basis points. Obviously we've raised the guidance there in terms of year-end expectations — greater than 240 x Evelyn — I guess testament to the high-growth, high-returns business model that we built. In terms of how you should think about it in terms of allocation, in terms of organic, we still see growth opportunities across all three businesses.

You can see the momentum we've got; we're executing well; we've now got a multi-year CAL record, we've got CAL targets out there and we've demonstrated in the first half three businesses, but in a disciplined way, per the answer earlier, to make sure we get the right risk-adjusted returns. On the inorganic side, obviously we've made our choices over the last few years, whether that's purchase of retail mortgages, unsecured — purchase unsecured — and more recently wealth.

So the near-term focus is very much on the successful integration of Evelyn. Pleased to say that that's on track and performing well. So then that links to, I guess, the latter part of your first question, which is distributions. Committed to the 50% of attributable profit for ordinary, and then on surplus capital we've got a very strong track record of returning our excess capital. We'll assess it, but we certainly see good value in buying back our shares where they currently are and we're absolutely committed to returning at the earliest opportunity and the signal we've given today — we expect to return at the year end — is good evidence of that. I think all of that really is to me, I guess, evidence of the model that we built. We've got a highly capital generative model that gives us great choices to dig that and then drive the distributions for shareholders. Katie?

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Sure. Thanks very much. Morning, Ben. So obviously we're really pleased with the strategic progress we've made in the first half of the year and the strengthening of that guidance that reflects, in a large part, the completion of the Evelyn Partners transaction which we're delighted about, but also our increased confidence following that strong H1 performance we've had and then our line of sight that we have for the rest of the year. So I think a couple of things that I would bear in mind in terms of income: we still expect Bank Rate to remain at 3.75% this year, so no change in that rate assumption as we go from here.

If I think of where we'll kind of see the growth coming through to get to 17.9, 275 million of it is Evelyn. In terms of where we are, then other things I would think about across the business is the strong balance growth that we've had and pipeline that we can see in corporate lending — you know, that will come through and will continue to drive NII growth. We then have the reinvestment, obviously, in the structural hedge that will come through.

Then if I look to the kind of non-interest income area, you know that we're continuing to deliver a lot of product propositions for our customers. We're really pleased with the performance in C&I at the beginning of the year; expect that to continue and, as we look at it, a kind of solid performance. One thing I would think about is, you know that we did have in the first half of the year higher insurance income in that non-interest income space — that was 45 million that came in.

That won't be a repeat, but overall a good trajectory for income in the second half — continued growth across all of the businesses and, importantly, supported by ongoing balance sheet growth. Thank you very much, Ben.

OPERATOR

Our next question comes from Guy Stebbings of BNP Paribas. Guy, please unmute and go ahead.

Guy Stebbings, Analyst at BNP Paribas

Hi. Morning. Taking questions. First question was just on net interest income. Thanks to some refinements in the hedge guidance. Are you able to confirm what swap assumptions you're using to sort of underpin that guidance this year, future years, etc.? That'd be very helpful. And then on the lending spreads, they went backwards a little bit more than the sort of pure mortgage back-book spread compression. I think that was just partly a function of good lending growth.

But maybe you could elaborate on the dynamics there and how we should think about that in future periods. And then a question just on sort of buybacks and capital. Very pleasing to see that commitment come forward. Just interested, is that purely a reflection of the better capital generation that you're seeing this year, or does it reflect in any way in terms of comfort around where Basel 3 land later this year? Thank you.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Okay, thanks, Guy. Why don't I take the third one very quickly? The buyback is very much driven by the performance in the first half of the year, Guy. It doesn't make any assumptions in terms of future regulatory. We've got the performance in the first half. We obviously have good line of sight on half-two performance. That's the simple answer.

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Sure. Thanks very much. So if we deal with the hedge reinvestment rates first of all, the 4% for the full year 2026, and that's 3.9% on the product hedge and 4.7% on the equity hedge. That's well ahead of the expectations we had at the start of the year where at that time our assumption was that we'd have two rate cuts, coming down to a terminal rate of 3.25%. So clearly we're benefiting from that reinvestment rate. It's also supporting our expected growth in our hedge income every year out to 2030.

So there is further upside if the current market rates are sustained. If I then go on to NIM, you're absolutely right. You can see within NIM, while there's a 2 basis point increase that we've had in the second quarter, that's built on 4 basis points in the deposit margin, clearly coming from the hedge, 2 basis points from funding and other, and then that's partly offset by the 4 basis point decrease in the lending margin. A couple of things happening within there.

We've talked a lot this year already around the roll-off of the higher five-year fixed mortgages that's coming through; that will be completed as we get to the end of this year. So that's good to see a little bit more stability that will come through in later years on return. But of course lower-margin areas like mortgages, but also in our Commercial & Institutional business. And so while we look forward, the structural hedge continues to be a positive tailwind for the rest of the year.

But those trends that we're seeing in the lending margins as we kind of add on high-returning business will continue as we go forward from here. So I would expect, Ben, that the NIM trajectory is likely to be—obviously NII is going to be driven by the volume growth that we're seeing. This for us is really disciplined choices in our capital allocation and the loan origination that we do. You should expect this growth to drive higher returns, as we've seen in H1'26.

And that's what's been reflected in our increased RoTE guidance. Thanks very much.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Good. Guy, thanks, Guy.

OPERATOR

Our next question comes from Benjamin Toms of RBC. Benjamin, please unmute and go ahead.

Benjamin Toms, Analyst at RBC Capital Markets

A clarification on that buyback and the quantum of the buyback at your end. Is the right way to think about it the issue that you distribute down to 13% on a post-Basel basis? And then secondly, a question on buy-to-let. We're seeing continued structural shift from amateur to professional buy-to-let landlords. Do you think you have the current capabilities to deal with that shift, or do you need some further build-out? Just a personal point on your Rooster card.

Can you stop charging for the jazzy front covers? Thanks.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

I won't comment on your parents. Right. Okay, Katie—

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Clear and deliberate, when we set our target of around 13% so that we can be flexible with that number for our capital allocation decisions. We're not managing down to a specific number, but as we've said before, we wouldn't have a problem printing a 12-handle for CET1, given that this is a point-in-time metric. We're really confident in our strong ongoing capital generation, as we've just demonstrated again these last six months. Obviously, you know, we haven't hit that 12 yet, despite even the absorption of the Evelyn Partners acquisition at Q2, given how strong our capital generation has been.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Good. And then on—good observation in terms of, I guess, the amateur to professional landlords. That's the reason why we put the strategic partnership in place with Banbay, and that's working really well for us. Really successful partnership. Obviously the combination of them and ourselves, we have the necessary capability. We have also been building out in parallel our internal capabilities. So we feel very, very comfortable in terms of both from an underwriting perspective, from a face-to-market perspective.

So yeah, that's why we took those steps last year actually. So, yeah, well placed on that front. So, yeah.

Benjamin Toms, Analyst at RBC Capital Markets

Thank you.

OPERATOR

Next question comes from Pearlie Mong of Bank of America. Please unmute.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Hi, Pearlie.

Pearlie Mong, Analyst at Bank of America

Hello. Good morning. So, questions—just one on the hedge and the reinvestment rate. I think the footnote says it is the macroeconomic assumptions, not for this year but outer years. If I look at IMS, I think it's 3.8%. Can I just clarify that that is what you're assuming for outer-year hedge roll-off assumptions? And then second question on non-NII. Can you help us understand a little bit more about sort of sustainable organic growth rate in that business?

Because it's been a bit lumpy and this quarter obviously is very, very good. But it's just one of those lines that I think we all find a little bit difficult to forecast growth prospects, other than, you know, the Evelyn advisory side of things, but the D2C side of things as well, because obviously some of your peers have been quite aggressive in pricing there and not charging any platform fees. So how do you make money and how do you monetize that D2C platform, and how does that link to the non-NII growth?

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Thanks, Pearl. Good questions. Katie, do you want to go with hedge and then I'll cover off wealth.

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Perfect. Yeah, super. Thanks very much. So, Pearlie—sorry, apologies if I wasn't clear, forgive me. If I look at the rate that we're assuming for 2026, it's the product hedge reinvesting at 3.9%. We marked our outer-year targets to market in terms of where they are, so that's still sticking with the kind of original assumption of the five-year swap rates of 3.5% through to 2028. So clearly, if this higher rate sustains as we go forward, you would see some additional benefit coming through from that as well.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Yeah. On D2C, Pearlie. So you can see we've shared today we now got 45,000 people in the last quarter—in the first half—invested with us for the first time. So we're pleased with that. Obviously, as part of the Evelyn acquisition we acquired a digital investing platform. We already have NatWest Invest as well. You'll see the opportunities and how we plan to execute against those opportunities. But the mindset we have around that is we see ourselves very much as the challenger, not the incumbent.

Most of the markets we operate in, we are the incumbent, but the reality is in that space we are the challenger. So we believe there are levers that we can pull, given we have the customer relationships and we have the product set, to be very competitive and very attractive. We've got the full end-to-end proposition in place now. Very excited about the opportunity and growth that can come from it. But more to come in the Q4 Spotlight. Thanks, Pearlie.

OPERATOR

This question comes from Andrew Coombs of Citi. Andrew, please unmute and go ahead.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Hey, Andrew.

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Morning, Andrew.

Andrew Coombs, Analyst at Citi

My answers—perhaps we can just dig a bit further into C&I. On slide 34 you helpfully give the lending and deposit margins by division. If I look at C&I and the lending margin—or asset yield, gross yield, I should say—has dipped from 6 to 5.5. So interested in any comments you have on the margin on the flow versus the stock, because obviously you're seeing strong growth there, but I assume it's into lower-margin segments. And then secondly, staying on the same slide, deposit yield in C&I has actually trended up slightly in the quarter—4 basis points—even down deposit competition.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Yeah, thanks. Okay, I'll take them, Katie, if that's okay. So on the C&I story, it's very much a mix—yeah, it's very much the mix story. We're deploying capital in areas which are low risk weights, high risk-adjusted returns—infrastructure, social housing, etc.—but obviously they're at lower margins. So we're very comfortable that's a great deployment of capital. It's driving growth but it's also driving returns. You should think of it—as to the deposit side—as primarily a function of where the deposit growth has come from.

There are very different ranges of pricing within the Commercial and Institutional base. Some of the growth this quarter has come from the large corporate institutional end. Obviously the pricing on that is finer than, for example, aspects of SME operational balances. So it just reflects that. That's how I'd think about it. Thanks, Andrew.

OPERATOR

Our next question comes from Rob Noble of Deutsche Bank. Rob, please unmute and go ahead.

Rob Noble, Analyst at Deutsche Bank

Morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Just one question really. So loans are growing very quickly and the deposits not as quickly at the moment, so your loan-to-deposit ratio has jumped—92%, I think. So how far are you willing to let that go, and what are the margin implications for just solely that aspect of loans growing faster than deposits, going forward?

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Thanks. Okay, so LDR—and Rob, can you just repeat the second one? We couldn't quite—

Rob Noble, Analyst at Deutsche Bank

The margin implications from purely the loan-to-deposit ratio going up—does that cause margin lower, given where the spreads are on both loans and deposits?

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, no, absolutely; let me talk to that, Rob. So as we look at it, we obviously manage our funding very holistically. We don't traditionally manage on an LDR basis within the bank—clearly something we look at, but it's not one of our key metrics. So as we're kind of looking at things, we really manage on the LCR. We've still got capacity to move lower than the current 140 average LCR that we have. You've also seen us this year be a little bit more active in covered bonds.

We do see that with the growth of the assets on the balance sheet, we're very mindful of actually where is the right place to fund them from—whether that's to go to the market or whether that's to do a little bit more on deposits. Paul talked a lot about the importance of deposits from a customer relationship as well. So we look to manage that, but clearly there is a little bit of an impact on that within the NIM as the lending margins, as you can see, are a bit tighter still at the moment.

We seek to manage all of those things, which is also why we're really focused on RoTE, to make sure that we're getting the right returns for the capital that we're deploying and obviously balancing and fully loading in the cost of where that funding is coming from.

OPERATOR

Thank you. Our next question comes from Chris Kant, Autonomous. Chris, please go ahead and ask your question.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Hey Chris, good morning.

Chris Kant, Analyst at Autonomous

Can you hear me?

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Hey Chris.

OPERATOR

Yeah, we got you.

Chris Kant, Analyst at Autonomous

Thanks for taking the questions. Appreciate it. I wanted to ask on capital and data centers, please. So on the 13% and kind of flexing around that 13% target, I think the more interesting thing to come out Bank of England FPC review process was actually this flexibility they expect to introduce around the OSI buffer under stress. And effectively if that happens, you're going to have one of the more hyper-flexible MDAs in the sector. Just curious how that feeds into your thinking about headroom to MDA over time, particularly with your Pillar 2 likely coming down next year.

It seems to me that there's room to actually nudge that target lower, potentially over time. Understand you're not announcing your... One of your domestic peers indicated there may be room to review that in their case next year and they already run with a tighter headroom to MDA than you do. And then on data centres, there's obviously a relatively high number being built in the UK. As you say, you're the largest commercial bank. I'm just interested in if you can comment on your exposure there, how you think about that area and in particular if you are taking exposures, how those get structured from a lending perspective, whether you have any sort of direct linkage into delivery of data center revenues down the line. Thank you.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Okay. Kate, did you want to take the first?

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Sure, absolutely. That's great. So I think, Chris, and good morning. And when we look at the target, I just sort of repeat again that we set our target very deliberately around 13%. So we're not pinning down to a specific number in mind. We wouldn't have a problem paying down to kind of a 12 handle in terms of CET1. What I would say is, as I look at the risk-weight framework that's going on, I know that you and Donal from our side are very involved in a lot of these overlaps between different parts of the framework, whether it's Pillar 2A or OSI or the CCyB kind of numbers.

I think one of the things that you can see that's helpful is for the committee reaffirming its judgment that the appropriate benchmark for us is their Tier 1 capital. So it's around that 13% of risk-weighted assets. Interestingly, that's equivalent to about a CET1 ratio of about 11%. So we may see some changes kind of come through from that. We've obviously got Basel 3.1 coming in, which we're confirming today is still around 10 that we're estimating for that.

As you can imagine, we don't kind of manage our capital by what may or may not happen in terms of making it easier to access those buffers. And I think we'll just very much watch to see how things develop. Again, we welcome the move that they are more releasable in stress. But at the moment it's no change in terms of what we're doing, what we're talking with you externally. Paul, can I come back to you?

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Yeah. On the, Chris, on your second question on data centers, we could probably spend a very long time talking about that and I'm sure the team are also happy to pick up bilaterally, but maybe try some broader thoughts which should help you. It won't surprise you, given the acceleration of data center and the associated infrastructure build-out, that we're very thoughtful in terms of when to deploy. Your point on how these things are structured — you very much think about it: it can be the physical security or it can be the long-term cash flows.

Where you're dependent on long-term cash flows, we're very focused on high-quality occupants — highly rated, highly graded — you know, almost exclusively the hyperscalers that you know. That would be how you should think about how these things are structured finance. So I feel we've got very strong expertise and we only participate where we're very confident around the security that sits behind it. There's a lot of talk and there's a lot of noise.

I think it's key that you remain disciplined in this part of the market and that's our approach. Hopefully that gives you a sense of it. But the key really is, if it's cash flows, then it's all about the creditworthiness of the occupant or the offtaker as it is.

OPERATOR

Our next question comes from Amit Goel of Mediobanca. Amit, please unmute and go ahead.

Amit Goel, Analyst at Mediobanca

Hi, thank you. Hopefully you can hear me. Sorry, it just still shows the mute button. So, yeah, actually just one kind of follow-up just on the capital. Apologies for kind of asking again but I guess I'm just still trying to size how much buyback you could contemplate at year end, and appreciate the comments. So you'd be happy or you'd be comfortable running with a 12 handle. Still just trying to get a sense of, like, you know, pro forma for the Basel 3.1 effect, you know, would you be happy running down to like a 12.5% type ratio, or is that too far out of the bounds of circa 13?

And then my second question was just on the non-interest income in retail. Just the comment about the, there were some effects relating to the accelerated recognition of back-book insurance income. Just kind of curious how big was that? And then does that mean that we're not getting that income in the second half of the year? So just how much delta to expect going into Q3, Q4?

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Let me try to help you a little bit. I'm not going to get into the niceties of what around 13 might mean. You guys are the masters of that kind of debate. But when we look at capital decisions, as we would always be looking a good few years out to make these kind of decisions, I think a way that could be helpful to you to think around is the RWA trajectory that we'll see in the second half. So we've been growing well this first half in lower risk-weighted lending areas such as mortgages and CIB, and we're confident that's going to continue in H2.

Partially offsetting that, you've seen our successful ongoing program of RWA management. We'll continue to execute transactions where economics make sense. We do have good line of sight of those RWA management actions for the rest of the year, following the £3.9 billion we did in the first half. Also, you should just bear in mind that we have got the annual risk uplift in Q4 as well. You can see historically what that number generally is. So if I bring all of those things together I would think through in the second half of the year on an RWA basis.

And then if I go to the retail side: what this was was very much the recognition of a transaction we did with our existing home insurance provider as we moved to a new provider. And so it's simply recognizing the income that would be flowing through over the next number of years into just now. The reality is, Amit, it was £45 million. So that'll be a non-repeat in future quarters. But you won't see a particular impact on the different quarters because it will have to build up a little bit — you'll see that kind of coming back in.

So for your model I would kind of think of the £45 million for this quarter and not worry too much about how it flows in and out over the next number of quarters. Hopefully that's helpful. Thank you.

OPERATOR

Great. Our next question comes from Nicholas Payan of Kepler Cheuvreux. Nicholas, please unmute and go ahead.

Nicholas Payan, Analyst at Kepler Cheuvreux

Hi. Morning. Thanks for the presentation. I have two questions, please. The first one would be on the retail banking and on the cost-income ratio. I can see a very strong improvement in the cost-income ratio. We are closer to the 40% mark. Just wanted to know what is the frontier actually, because I can see that, you know, talking about AI quite a lot. I think the AI usage just tripled. Cora — you also mentioned that your account, I think, decreased by 400x Evelyn Partners.

So, yeah, anything structural going there and if we could expect the cost-income ratio to actually go below the 40% mark. That's the first question. And the second question is coming back on your comment, Katie, regarding RWA managements. Just wanted to know what your SRT benefit is currently included in your CET1 ratio. You mentioned it was part of your toolkit. So I just wanted to know whether or not it's going to accelerate or if we have hit a run rate on that front.

Thank you.

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Sorry, forgive me if... So we look at where we are. This is year three of our SRT program. So I would say at the moment that we're not quite at our run rate, but by the end of this year you'd sort of see that while there would still be more actions, you'd be filling in a lot of the historic deals. So we would expect to do more in the Pillar 3 in terms of where we are, but we do think we still have a little bit more capacity. Building on the £3.9 billion RWA actions that we did earlier in the year.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Yeah, yeah. So on the cost-income ratio, overall we've made great progress. You know, you can see cost-income ratio has improved again. We're driving cost-income ratio improvement through all of the businesses, I would say, but the retail team have done a great job, as you alluded to, to get to the circa... to do that, and they continue to drive productivity and efficiency. And when we laid out our group target of less than 45% for '28, obviously we had some assumptions about what the different businesses would contribute.

We've also said our ambitions go beyond 45% at a group level, and when we see the opportunity in front of us — some of them driven by AI, but not exclusively by AI. You may have heard me say before, I don't see AI as the Hail Mary here. We've still got a lot of good productivity and efficiency levers that we're pulling across the group that is improving the underlying efficiency of the business. So I'm not going to give you, in your words, a frontier number for retail.

But we are absolutely confident that as well as growing, we can continue to drive operating leverage, take care, and improve costs, including in retail. Thanks.

Nicholas Payan, Analyst at Kepler Cheuvreux

Thank you.

OPERATOR

Our final question comes from Edward Firth of KBW. Ed, please go ahead and ask your question. Hey, Ed there?

Edward Firth, Analyst at KBW

Sorry. Yes, Sam, can you hear me okay?

OPERATOR

Yeah, we got you now.

Edward Firth, Analyst at KBW

Sorry. Morning, everybody. Yeah, I just had two quick questions. The first one was just picking up on a comment you made, I think, Katie — tell me if I'm wrong — that you thought the NIM trajectory would be flatter in the second half. I mean, given that it was up only four basis points in the first half, that sounds like we're getting pretty close to flat. First, just wanted to check that that is a correct understanding. And I guess in that context, we've got another big year for the hedge next year, but after that it grows, but grows quite modestly.

And I'm just trying to think, is this pricing in the market? Do you, as that starts to disappear, think some of these competitive pressures will disappear? Because I think you said a lot of the pressure came from mix. Now that's not going to change. So once these hedge benefits go — which we said '28, '29 — are we actually saying the underlying margin will start declining? So I guess that's my first question. And the second one was: there's an awful lot of talk on this call and all the other calls about capital and the Bank of England potentially reducing capital requirements, et cetera, et cetera, Pillar 2 cover, etcetera.

You're making a 20% return. You're growing well above nominal GDP. I mean, what are we looking for? And actually, 20% is not enough — we should be making 25. I mean, have you got unutilized capacity for growth that you can put to work? I don't really understand. It seems to me that if you reduce capital requirements, all that's going to happen is margins will come down and your return will return. I mean, 20% return's plenty, isn't it? Thanks very much.

Katie Murray — Group Chief Financial Officer

Okay, shall I start off on that note? You're absolutely right. I did reference a flatter NIM. My comment was directional. As you know, we don't guide on that. I think the important thing is that it really is around the deliberate choices that we've made to grow in lower-risk but high-return areas like CIB and mortgages, which is driving that lower kind of lending margin. You know that at the end of this year, we've got the drag from the roll-off of the higher-margin five-year mortgage business as we go on from here.

And then there's the offset in our margin with the improvements on the deposit hedge, the structural hedge, which continues to deliver into 2027, 2028 and beyond. And obviously I've talked about the better rates that we've had just now. That will strengthen not just 2027 but it will also strengthen the later years as well as we move forward from that. You know I don't generally comment on consensus but we have given you good guidance on what our expectation is for the full-year income as we go forward from here.

Overall, while I do expect flat earnings based on the pipeline, we do expect the volume to drive higher NII in the second half in line with our guidance, and then further income growth each year out to 2028 and beyond from there.

Edward Firth, Analyst at KBW

Good. Could I hand back to you?

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Yeah. Okay, thank you. And then on the second question, I guess simply on the question on the capital reg side to conclude so everybody knows exactly where they stand. We're at the very tail end of IRB, the tail end of that Basel 3. I just think kind of conclusion and certainty would be helpful for all stakeholders. So our message is, in a way, no more complicated on that in terms of then what we would do with any hypothetical additional capital.

We're just very— we manage the business for returns. We'll deploy it where we see demand. At the moment we can see that demand is there and that growth obviously will support returns into the medium term. So I don't want to oversimplify it, but that's how we're thinking about the regs and that's how we're thinking about how we deploy capital organically, and that's a virtuous cycle as you know. You know, we deploy into growth, high returns drive that, drive capital generation, drives distributions.

So it's no more— no more complicated than that, but hopefully it gives you a little bit of colour. Thanks Ed.

OPERATOR

There are no more questions so I'd now like to hand back to Paul for closing comments.

Paul Thwaite, CEO

Okay, thanks Matt and thank you everybody for your questions. We appreciate it. I hope you've seen today in the presentation, and hopefully in the Q&A, the momentum we got in terms of driving both sustainable growth and returns. We're very pleased with that. We've delivered growth across all three businesses, as we touched on several times. We've improved and increased our operating leverage. We're now the most efficient large UK bank. We have the lowest cost of risk and we're delivering the strongest capital.

The mindset of management is that this is very much the start, not the end. We're very ambitious for the future of the business, so we're determined to capitalize on some of those leading positions that we've created and also our exposure to some of the structural drivers within the UK. And hopefully that will lead us to accelerate momentum you've already seen today. So our strategy is all about driving strong, compounding growth and sustainable returns.

So we look forward to updating you on that both in the Spotlight in quarter four and then in our quarter three results. So wish you a good Friday and

OPERATOR

That concludes today's presentation. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company's SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants' and analysts' statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice.